Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Enviro Warrior - Wake up and smell the Homus ... then tread lightly upon the planet.

 

Introducing the Waterless Washing Machine.

In Australia, we are only beginning to consider upgrading for the newly offered water efficient, 4-star washing-machine cash rebate. However, by comparison, the entire idea of washing clothes without water itself has already reached its spin-cycle for eco-conscious Europeans.

The word from the UK is that they are about to spin-release a waterless washing machine, which uses as little as a single cup of water per washing cycle! In fact, Xeros Ltd., which itself has been spun out of the University of Leeds, by commercialising the technology developed there, confirmed on Monday that the new machines released next year ‘... would use less than 2% of the water and energy of a conventional washing machine.’

That’s a huge saving when you consider that 2 million new washing machines are currently being sold in the UK alone each year. If you do the math, with a typical washing ratio of about 35 kg of water (about 21 litres) for every kilogram of clothes, in addition to the power needed to heat the water and dry the clothes, that’s about 420,000,000 million litres of water saved, not to mention tonnes of coal and units of power.



The new Xeros machine uses ‘plastic chips’ to remove the dirt and stains from clothes. The added bonus being that the process leaves them dry as well, further reducing energy consumption otherwise used for drying.

The Company, who recently secured investments capital of almost 500,000 pounds ($984,400) from IP Group Plc, told Reuters the price of the new machines was "... not expected to be dramatically different from (conventional) washing machines."

Whilst it all sounds great in theory, some sceptical environmentalists are suggesting it all sounds like another 'get rich quick,' niche-market, poorly researched product, which may not work out cheaper in the long run, when looked at more closely?

Not silly, if consider that with cheap oil running out, clearly the amount of both oil and water needed to create the 20 kilos of chips required to wash 100 loads of clothing is absurd to start with?

In truth, it IS a lot of plastic when you consider that the average housewife washes at least 6 - 10 full loads a week, which would equate to a new load of ‘chips’ every couple of months. Other factors involve looking at the level of dirt on the clothes in each load, because the dirtier the clothes the fewer times you can re-use the ‘chips.’

So, if the Xeros System does take off ... it could mean that instead of using billions of litres of a renewable and recyclable element like water, we would be generating more untold millions of tonnes of plastics, with god only knows what effects on the environment?

Any good environmentalist or eco-consciousness citizen of the 21st Century worth their weight in land-fill, would take the time these days to automatically stop at this point, and ask the burning question, “CAN THESE CHIPS BE RECYCLED?” If so, how much does it cost, is the technology already available and if it is, how much more energy and water will recycling use, rather than using our old fashioned machines to begin with?

All cleverly concealed weapons of 'mass distraction' by advertising companies trying to bamboozle the consumer trying to make an environmentally sound choice?

Let's think it through again, shall we.

If you multiply 20 kilos of chips by (just) the 30,000,000 dwellings in the UK alone, you cannot help but to see the *massive* disposal issues that could arise if everyone rushed out to purchase this new eco-friendly, wonder-gizmo, en masse, with no recycling in place to counteract it?

Sounds like ‘progress’ for the sake of progress and hang the consequences, doesn't it?

Maybe we should all get back to the river and start bashing our clothes with rocks again or re-think the entire problem.

Sanyo has done exactly that with their own idea of Waterless Washing Technology.

Originally created by Singapore Students in 2005, Sanyo's AirWash, converts air to ozone and uses it to clean your clothes. Ozone has a strong oxidation action, which either destroys or disassembles the cell walls of bacteria. Based on the natural cleaning action of negative ions in a waterfall, this process allows for eliminating bacteria, odors, and dirt (organic matter) from your clothes.

They claim that the oxidised-ozone simply returns to oxygen after it has completed its cycle, making it easy on the environment.

How the AirWash 'Washes.'


The machine also has a “normal” washing cycle, which uses water recycled from the rinse cycle and ozone together, leading to a big reduction in water use when compared to more conventional machines.

The AirWash uses no plastic chips and produces no other waste beside oxygen. It is neat, sleek and stands in a small space, and has the potential to make conventional, eco-superfreaky dry cleaning obsolete.

And not to be left out of the wash, the design labs at Electrolux have churned-up yet another revolutionary waterless washing machine concept, called the KaionWAVE washing system. (Left) Their offering uses ultraviolet-C light to wash nano-coated fabrics.

God only knows where you have to go to buy the nano-coating sprays, nor how they may or may not affect the skin on contact?

The other marvel on offer by Electrolux at the moment, is the Sunshine Washer, (right), which uses the power of the sun and the sunshine effect to do the laundry, solar style.

Among the two, the solar washing unit impresses the most with its solar energy harnessing feature and slim-looks.

The only remaining question in all this C-light-solar-ion technology, is where the actual ‘organic matter’ from your clothes actually goes, and if it can be collected and used in the compost pile, without making next seasons capsicum taste bitter?


117
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
11 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]
1. June 12th 2008 @ 00:17. Louie Says:
these would be my issues as well

Not silly, if consider that with cheap oil running out, clearly the amount of both oil and water needed to create the 20 kilos of chips required to wash 100 loads of clothing is absurd to start with?

and

So, if the Xeros System does take off ... it could mean that instead of using billions of litres of a renewable and recyclable element like water, we would be generating more untold millions of tonnes of plastics, with god only knows what effects on the environment?

It is easy to solve one problem yet create another but HOPEFULLY they will come up with a better solution than the plastic because using less water and power does sound good....

and yes where the f^&k do I buy nano coated clothing for crying out loud?
2. June 12th 2008 @ 19:11. Wilson Pon Says:
A brilliant idea that can save lots of water and materials...

Also, love the design as well (The lower one seen like a giant dinosaur egg to me...lol)
3. June 12th 2008 @ 22:03. Lilla Says:
Why Louie, from a Nano-mart of course.

I heard that Gucci were releasing its new line of formaldehyde based nano-nylon, it has all the cleaning fluids already impregnated in the cloth, so you don't ever have to use water to clean it, it washes whilst you sweat.

However, researcher are a little worried about their trial candidates having all mysteriously died of brain tumours and liver cancers within a short time after the trials?

Quite the mystery...There are some conspiracy theories and rumours of course ... but you know there is no truth in those.

Someone even suggested that it failed becuase the skin is porous *laughs* as if!

Lilla ...
4. June 12th 2008 @ 22:11. Lilla Says:
Hi Wilson,

Yes, the AirWash seems to be the best option here, I agree. However, it will depend on what chemicals (if any) need to be "pressed" into the fabric during manufacture, in order to make the process more efficient?

But the thinking is original and it is a step in the right direction, no doubts about it... although until we have the best answer, I like the idea of councils forcing more water tanks and water harvesting infrastructure -= including recycling plants - in general.

Nothing cleanses like water.

Lilla ...
5. July 23rd 2008 @ 03:31. Miswanderlust Says:
Lilla
A well written post as usual. Have you seen this Engadget link? This is a very interesting concept. One of the problems I see is the cost. Reduced water washing machines are very expensive. For us regular folks, I can't afford a thousand dollars for a reduced water washing machine; I hope that the low water machines are more cost effecient.

Always good to see you!

Mis
6. August 11th 2008 @ 06:22. jay singh Says:
Hey Lilla

Stuff all this. They are coming up with this brilliant plan!
A global collection agency will collect all our clothes once a week take them, wash them and deliver them back at your door.

As you know the average house does about 6 washes a week. This was your clothes will be picked up only once a week there by reducing the number of times we use the washing machine dramatically.

It is expected that the traditional environmentally taxing machines would become obsolete and we will have the world washing together. One world. One dream.

The impact on the environment is next to none as this process is going to use next to no water.

The solution. Outsourcing to China who we will fly it to space.

We have found water on Mars!!

(p.s. please don't bother me with the pedantic theatrics of the cost of rocket fuel and other silly stuff)

Isn't it funny how corporations can find ways to manipulate the consumer sentiments? I would think it would actually be easier and more beneficial to the bottom line is they actually try to actually match the sentiments and put a little effort into genuinely trying to resolve some of the problems.
7. August 11th 2008 @ 08:38. Lilla Says:
Hi Jay,

HAHAHAHAHAHA - I couldnt agree more.

I love the idea here of flying my smalls to China *chuckle* no need for rocket fuel, we have formaldehyde and if it is impregnated in the cloth itself with another cocktail ... who knows?

As I said before, the clothes may even cleanse themselves whilst you sweat.. brain tumours and other small details? ... hmmm not a bad side effect when considering population control ... certainly something in this one world stuff.

Thanks again for your thoughtful comment and a much needed laugh!

Lilla ...
8. August 11th 2008 @ 09:57. jay singh Says:
well i guess the brain tumours fwould also help in other major environmental problems, like food shortages etc.

I mean the way things are going we could do with a little population control.

(no offence to any cancer patients out there, especially those suffering from the utter lack of intelligance and care of those bent upon destrying everything in their path to keep the red away from their bottomlines.

J
9. August 25th 2008 @ 05:02. Lilla Says:
Hi Mis,

Forgive me for missing your comment... (ha! pardon the pun).

Yes, I agree, the cost is too high in both resources, and well outpriced for the average family. To my way of thinking, spending the money on individual household water-recycling units would be far more effective when it comes to engaging our 'superior human intellect,' don't you agree?

Always a pleasure to see you too ...

Lilla ...
10. September 11th 2008 @ 11:39. Mac Says:
This is a very interesting article. These machines seem to save water but then waste some other of earth's resources. Back to the drawing board for the scientists, and they better design something more affordable.
11. September 13th 2008 @ 23:10. Lilla Says:
Hi Mac,

mmm, that is the thing isn;t it? they seemed to be such a good idea when I first started lookinga t them, and then as the research went a little deeper, I started to notice that this is so very far from being a solution to a rather dirty problem.

Back to the drawing board indeed!

Thanks for your great comment, I look forward to visiting your blog over the coming weeks.

Lilla ...

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
2 Posts
108 Posts dating from October 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Lilla's Blogs

6996 Vote(s)
873 Comment(s)
66 Post(s)
729 Vote(s)
45 Comment(s)
10 Post(s)
4852 Vote(s)
325 Comment(s)
45 Post(s)
Moderated by Lilla
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]